Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAfonso, J.M.S.
dc.contributor.authorVila, D.A.
dc.contributor.authorGan, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorQuispe, D.P.
dc.contributor.authorBarreto, N.J.C.
dc.contributor.authorChinchay, J.H.H.
dc.contributor.authorPalharini, R.S.A.
dc.identifier.citationAfonso, J.M.S.; Vila, D.A.; Gan, M.A.; Quispe, D.P.; Barreto, N.J.C.; Chinchay, J.H.H.; Palharini, R.S.A. (2020). Precipitation diurnal cycle assessment of satellite-based estimates over Brazil Remote Sens. 2020, 12(14), 2339 Doi: 10.3390/rs12142339en_US
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this study is to assess the ability of several high-resolution satellite-based precipitation estimates to represent the Precipitation Diurnal Cycle (PDC) over Brazil during the 2014–2018 period, after the launch of the Global Precipitation Measurement satellite (GPM). The selected algorithms are the Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP), The Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) and Climate Prediction Center (CPC) MORPHing technique (CMORPH). Hourly rain gauge data from different national and regional networks were used as the reference dataset after going through rigid quality control tests. All datasets were interpolated to a common 0.1° × 0.1° grid every 3 h for comparison. After a hierarchical cluster analysis, seven regions with different PDC characteristics (amplitude and phase) were selected for this study. The main results of this research could be summarized as follow: (i) Those regions where thermal heating produce deep convective clouds, the PDC is better represented by all algorithms (in term of amplitude and phase) than those regions driven by shallow convection or low-level circulation; (ii) the GSMaP suite (GSMaP-Gauge (G) and GSMaP-Motion Vector Kalman (MVK)), in general terms, outperforms the rest of the algorithms with lower bias and less dispersion. In this case, the gauge-adjusted version improves the satellite-only retrievals of the same algorithm suggesting that daily gauge-analysis is useful to reduce the bias in a sub-daily scale; (iii) IMERG suite (IMERG-Late (L) and IMERG-Final (F)) overestimates rainfall for almost all times and all the regions, while the satellite-only version provide better results than the final version; (iv) CMORPH has the better performance for a transitional regime between a coastal land-sea breeze and a continental amazonian regime. Further research should be performed to understand how shallow clouds processes and convective/stratiform classification is performed in each algorithm to improve the representativity of diurnal cycle.en_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - SENAMHIen_US
dc.sourceServicio Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología del Perúen_US
dc.subjectHierarchical systemsen_US
dc.subjectStatistical testsen_US
dc.subjectRain gagesen_US
dc.titlePrecipitation diurnal cycle assessment of satellite-based estimates over Brazilen_US
dc.identifier.isni0000 0001 0746 0446
dc.description.peerreviewPor pares
dc.identifier.journalRemote Sensing
dc.source.journalRemote Sens

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess